Brnovich praises ruling striking down all of ACA, including pre-existing condition coverage




    Attorney General Mark Brnovich speaking at the 2016 Leadership Series with the Arizona Cardinals hosted by the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry in August 2016. Photo by Gage Skidmore | Flickr

    Yesterday, we noted that Brnovich did not respond to the Mirror’s request for comment on the ruling by a federal judge that the entirety of the Affordable Care Act, most commonly known as Obamacare, was unconstitutional. Arizona was a plaintiff in the suit because Brnovich joined Texas and 18 other states in filing it.

    The result of the ruling, if it survives appeal, would be to upend the health insurance market and remove programs and provisions that allow tens of millions of Americans and millions of Arizonans to have substantial insurance coverage for medical costs. Among them are requirements that insurance companies can’t deny or charge people more for pre-existing conditions, subsidies for people to buy health insurance and funding for states to expand Medicaid to include more low-income people, including children and those who are older.

    In a written statement provided this morning, Brnovich praised the ruling by a judge in a Texas district court.

    “Americans have seen their premiums skyrocket since the passage of the Affordable Care Act. The whole plan was deceptive, ineffective and eventually unconstitutional,” he said. “Congress must now implement a program that will really allow Americans to secure coverage for new and pre-existing medical conditions.”

    The overwhelming consensus from legal observers, whether liberal or conservative, is that the ruling by Judge Reed O’Connor is unlikely to withstand appeal. The lawsuit argued that, because Congress in 2017 removed the financial penalty for individuals who did not comply with the mandate to purchase health insurance, the entire 900-page law is invalidated and unconstitutional.

    In a New York Times op-ed, conservative law professor Jonathan Adler and liberal law professor Abbe Gluck argued that O’Connor’s ruling, and the argument made by Arizona and the other states, is “beyond the pale.” In another op-ed, the pair called the ruling “shocking” and said it is essentially lawless.

    “(T)he opinion by Judge Reed O’Connor is an exercise of raw judicial power, unmoored from the relevant doctrines concerning when judges may strike down a whole law because of a single alleged legal infirmity buried within,” Adler and Gluck wrote.

    Jim Small
    Jim Small is a native Arizonan and has covered state government, policy and politics since 2004, with a focus on investigative and in-depth policy reporting, first as a reporter for the Arizona Capitol Times, then as editor of the paper and its prestigious sister publications, the Yellow Sheet Report and Arizona Legislative Report. Under his guidance, the Capitol Times won numerous state, regional and national awards for its accountability journalism and probing investigations into state government operations.

    1 COMMENT

    1. Brnovich’s assertions to the contrary, this year’s ACA marketplace choices are up and premiums for comparable plans are down on average. Too bad he doesn’t know what the facts are in his own state. Hundreds of thousands of Arizonans will lose their healthcare coverage, or see premiums skyrocket, or be forced to buy substandard plans if this decision stands. He should be held accountable for being part of this fiasco and will be once voters realize the truth.

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here