Gov. Doug Ducey gives a briefing on the state’s handling of COVID-19 during a news conference in Phoenix July 16, 2020. Photo by Cheryl Evans/The Arizona Republic | Pool photo
New legislation that limits the power of future Arizona governors to declare a public health emergency has passed the Senate Government Committee with a slim margin and now awaits debate by the full Senate.
Senate Bill 1009 caps a governor’s state of emergency proclamation for reasons of public health to 120 days, and only 30 days at a time. After the 120 days are up, the proclamation is terminated unless the legislature decides to extend it. Those legislative extensions could happen indefinitely, but also in 30-day increments.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
State of emergency declarations allow governors to take direct control of local and state agencies and access emergency funds. More recently, they have been used to enact mask mandates or quarantines.
Arizona has been in a state of emergency due to COVID-19 since March 2020. Ducey has issued executive orders to monitor COVID-19 spread, increase funding for businesses and expand access to vaccines, among others.
Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, R-Scottsdale, who introduced the bill and worked on it with Ducey’s support, said that passing it was imperative, given that it was impossible to predict who could become governor next. Ugenti-Rita included the language in the annual budget last session, but the Arizona Supreme Court struck it down as one of dozens of measures that was unconstitutionally added to the budget. Emergency declarations, she said, come with multiple executive orders that aren’t enacted with legislative agreement.
“(Emergency) powers have been misused and abused. I wasn’t prepared for how these were going to be weaponized to subvert our process here at the legislature,” she said.
SB1009 and several other bills on the docket about election security brought a crowd to the hearing room.
Gail Golec, a known conspiracy theorist currently running for the Maricopa Board of Supervisors in District 2 said she supported the bill. Golec is both anti-mask and anti-vaccine, and has spread false claims on her Facebook page that countries with high mortality rates have more deaths because of the large number of vaccinated people.
“I’m definitely in favor of this bill to no longer hold us hostage in this state under emergency use authorization,” said Golec, of SB1009.
After more speakers brought up their frustrations with the current state of emergency, Chairwoman Kelly Townsend, R-San Tan Valley, noted that the governor was just as eager to rescind the emergency state. Ducey is keeping it in place to prevent cities and towns from implementing their own emergency orders. Last year a bill was passed that restricted the power of cities, counties and school boards to implement orders related to COVID-19, like mask mandates, but the Arizona School Board Association successfully challenged it in court.
“As we’ve seen, Tucson uses a heavy hand when it comes to these things. If we rescind the emergency order as it stands right now, (cities and towns) can enact their own,” said Townsend.
Tucson Democratic Senator Sally Ann Gonzales responded to this by lauding Tucson Mayor Regina Romero’s efforts to protect her constituents and voicing opposition to the bill.
“We are in a pandemic,” she pointed out, prompting raucous laughter from the audience, which was filled with conservatives there to champion a host of bills aimed at combating non-existent election fraud.
Gonzales rebutted Townsend’s claims that Ducey wants to end the state of emergency by questioning why he hasn’t done it if so. Without declaring a state of emergency, she said, the state would not have received the federal funds it has been able to.
For Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, the bill doesn’t go far enough. He objected to the 120 day limit as still too long to permit a governor’s state of emergency to remain uncontested.
“I don’t think many businesses can live past 120 days,” he said, “The government shouldn’t have authority or the right to shut down somebody’s business.”
Those who were concerned with protecting themselves from COVID-19 are perfectly able to do so without emergency orders that limit normal business operations, he said.
The audience cheered and clapped as Petersen concluded.
Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Glendale, said the bill wasn’t about the current existing emergency order, but about future public health crises — and it would harm how effectively future governors may be able to respond. The indefinite length afforded by current statute is better than what SB1009 offers, Quezada said, because it gives governors ample time to coordinate efforts to enact change.
SB1009 passed 4-3, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing.
Townsend cast her vote after acknowledging the constitutional guarantee of representative government. Citizens should have lawmakers develop policy on their behalf, not be subject to the decisions of one person, as happens with executive orders. The last legislative session failed in this respect, she said.The benefit of SB1009 is that it would require the legislature to approve an extended state of emergency in the event it was warranted. She cited the smallpox epidemic as an example of a real emergency, which had a mortality rate estimated at about 30%. COVID-19 doesn’t compare, Townsend said.
At last count, COVID-19 deaths in Arizona number at more than 25,000. Nationally, more than 868,000 people have died of the illness.
“It’s not about politics, it’s not about partisanship, it’s about the health of the people,” Townsend said.
SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.