Nativist Republicans call on Ducey to militarize the border to stop an ‘invasion’
The ‘invasion’ rhetoric has fueled white supremacist mass murderers in recent years
Former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, of Citizens for Renewing America, joined a group of Arizona GOP lawmakers to call on Gov. Doug Ducey to use his power to curb illegal immigration from Mexico. Photo by Gloria Gomez | Arizona Mirror/University of Arizona
A nativist former top Trump White House official on Wednesday exhorted Gov. Doug Ducey to use Arizona’s National Guard to turn immigrants back at the border.
Ken Cuccinelli, a top United States Citizenship and Immigration Services official in Donald Trump’s administration, said Ducey has the constitutional ability to direct national guardsmen to remove those crossing the southern border. Cuccinelli, who is now a senior fellow on immigration issues at the conservative Center for Renewing America, pointed to the “self defense clause” of the Constitution that prohibits states from engaging in war unless they’re facing immediate danger or active invasion. He said the recent influx of immigrants qualifies as such.
“Thumbprint them, give them food and water and send them back,” he said.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Cuccinelli spoke at the Arizona Capitol Wednesday, flanked by several Republican state legislators.
With the U.S. seeing a record-breaking number of encounters at its southern border that is straining Border Patrol agents and the country’s capacity to process migrants, Republican leaders in Arizona and nationally have insisted there is an “open border” and that the influx of migrants — many seeking asylum — are foreign invaders who need to be repelled.
Under Cuccinelli’s approach, immigrants would be blocked from entry and returned immediately, without the due process outlined in U.S. immigration law or regard for federal and international asylum laws.
For nearly two years, federal border agents have been doing just that. The Trump and Biden administration have used the public health Title 42 authority, which effectively closed U.S. borders and allows border agents to immediately expel anyone they encounter at and between official ports of entry, even if they are seeking asylum under U.S. law.
The Remain in Mexico policy, which came back into effect last month, also allows federal immigration agents to send back asylum seekers to Mexico to wait and reside there while their immigration cases in the U.S. are processed.
Since April, Ducey has deployed about 150 members of the Arizona National Guard on a “border security mission” to support local and state law enforcement with camera maintenance and monitoring, and medical operations in detention centers, among other things, according to the Governor’s Office.
Immigration fearmongering twists data and history
Sen. Sonny Borrelli, R-Lake Havasu City, said precedent for involving the National Guard in immigration affairs had already been set by President Woodrow Wilson’s National Defense Act of 1916, which was enacted in response to raids by armed Mexican revolutionaries and U.S. troops being held by the Mexican president. There’s no precedent for a governor commanding national guardsmen to expel migrants.
Rep. John Kavanagh, a Fountain Hills Republican, lamented that the Supreme Court found it was unconstitutional for Arizona to enforce immigration law. Laws like Senate Bill 1070, he said, allow police officers to detain those suspected of illegal entry, but there’s a disconnect when they’re turned over to federal immigration agents.
“The real problem is when we legally apprehend them, the current administration rolls out the welcome wagon and relocates them,” Kavanagh said.
Republicans nationwide have condemned the priorities for enforcement that immigration agents were directed to follow under President Joe Biden. While all undocumented immigrants were a priority for arrest and removal under Trump, the Biden administration has said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement must follow guidelines that prioritize those with a criminal record or who pose a threat to national or border security.
Rep. Jake Hoffman, R-Queen Creek, misrepresented crime data to claim rising immigration has contributed to a spike in crime. In fact, the Customs and Border Protection report that he cited describes the previous convictions of non-citizens the agency arrested, not only crimes they had committed after coming to America. Hoffman didn’t provide sources to show that immigrant criminal activity significantly contributed to overall crime rates.
Hoffman instead touted the legislature’s surplus and an estimated $1.8 billion in one-time money available for the upcoming fiscal year.
“There’s not a price too high for your safety,” he said.
Lake Havasu City GOP Rep. Leo Biasiucci echoed Hoffman, blaming Arizona’s rising drug and human and sex trafficking problems on the “open border.”
Nativist rhetoric has driven white supremacist terrorism
Cuccinnelli said it’s not enough to build a physical barrier, but that it’s imperative Arizona take control of the federal borders in the state. He then made xenophobic statements about migrants and said there are gang members, sex offenders and cartel members among them.
“You can build a wall, but if you don’t back it up with manpower, it won’t change the illegal invasion flow,” he said.
The “invasion” terminology has long been used by the nativist movement in Arizona and elsewhere. It has also been used by white supremacist terrorists like the El Paso shooter, who targeted Mexicans at a Walmart, and the Christchurch, gunman who killed Muslims at two mosques in New Zealand.
The claim that the rise in border crossings is not an issue of illegal immigration was a common thread during the conference. Cuccinelli in particular said it isn’t a matter of crafting immigration law, but rather in defending against an “invasive” force.
When asked about asylum seekers, Cuccinelli said that Arizona follows all treaties, including the convention against torture. Since it’s safe to assume Mexico doesn’t torture its citizens, he said, it’s OK to send them back.
One of the treaties signed by the U.S. is the 1967 Protocol, which states that countries must not send refugees back to their country of persecution, or to countries that would do so. The Refugee Act of 1980 also declared the U.S. policy of aiding refugees, including resettlement or repatriation where necessary.
In a 2021 report titled Delivered to Danger, Human Rights First found there were “at least 1,544 publicly reported cases of murder, rape, torture, kidnapping, and other violent assaults against asylum seekers and migrants forced to return to Mexico”
According to reports from the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, average daily encounters between CBP officers and migrants ranged from 5,500 and 6,900 from March to September. From October onwards, encounters fell to a daily average of less than 2,500.
For pastor Rep. Lupe Diaz, R-Benson, unlawful border crossings have a biblical angle.
“God is the one that designated borders,” Diaz said.
Diaz noted that, in the Bible, entry into Israel required circumcision. In the United States, he said, the requirements are only legal entry and the oath of allegiance. In reality, the process of naturalization can take decades to complete and isn’t always open to all who enter the U.S. legally.
Cuccinelli urged Ducey to take action, not merely promise to. The resources and legislative backing is there, the rest is up to Ducey, he said.
“Arizona has the power to decide if it is being invaded, and has the power to defend itself,” Cuccinelli said. “Do not pass go, do not ask Joe Biden.”
Laura Gómez contributed to this story.
***UPDATED: This story has been updated to include Ken Cuccinelli’s current title.
SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.