Iowa’s Grassley emerges as key as Senate GOP pushes Supreme Court vote

By: and - September 21, 2020 3:29 pm

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Photo by Gage Skidmore | Wikimedia Commons

WASHINGTON — Intense attention fastened Monday on Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley as Senate Republicans undertook a furious effort to confirm a nominee to fill a Supreme Court vacancy before Inauguration Day.

If Grassley joins two other GOP senators in opposing a vote on a nominee, it would leave Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell with an even slimmer margin to win confirmation for the replacement for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have already said the winner of the presidential election should choose the next justice.

Grassley said in July that if a Supreme Court justice died this year, if he were Judiciary Committee chairman he would not hold a hearing on a new nominee because he did not do so in a similar situation in 2016. He is no longer chairman but was four years ago when President Barack Obama unsuccessfully sought the confirmation of Judge Merrick Garland to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

When asked whether Grassley has changed his position since the death of Ginsburg on Friday, Grassley spokesman Michael Zona referred to the senator’s July statement. “Sen. Grassley spoke in July about what he would do as chairman,” Zona said in an email, leaving the question open of whether Grassley would support McConnell.

McConnell (R-Ky.) pledged Friday to hold a confirmation vote on the Senate floor, but it’s unclear whether he has enough support to do so this year. He also did not specify whether the vote would come before or after the November election.

Among other Republican senators, those backing McConnell included Arizona’s Martha McSally, Rob Portman of Ohio, Lamar Alexander and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler of Georgia.

On Monday, President Donald Trump announced he was considering five women to fill the seat left vacant by the death of Ginsburg, an icon of the left who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1993. Trump said he would “probably” announce his pick on Saturday and said he hopes the vote will take place before the election. Ginsburg, however, according to her granddaughter, said before her death that it was her “most fervent wish” to not be replaced before Inauguration Day.

Nominees to the high court need a simple majority to win confirmation.

Republicans control 53 seats in the Senate. Opposition from Grassley, Collins and Murkowski would leave Trump and McConnell with a maximum possibility of 50 GOP votes if the nominee were to come to the Senate floor before Election Day. That would mean Vice President Mike Pence most likely would cast a tie-breaking vote in favor of the nominee.

Trump and McConnell could lose yet another vote in support of confirmation this year if Arizona’s McSally loses her special election contest against former astronaut Mark Kelly, a Democrat. If Kelly wins, he could take office as early as Nov. 30, giving Democrats a key vote against Trump’s nominee and possibly enough votes to block confirmation.

McSally and at least 21 other Republican senators support a vote on a nominee this year, even though many opposed confirming Garland in 2016, according to a whip count compiled by The Washington Post.

Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) came out in strong opposition to confirming a Supreme Court nominee in an election year in 2016 but changed his tune this year. “I will support President @realDonaldTrump in any effort to move forward,” he tweeted this weekend.

Other GOP senators have not made their views known publicly.

Senate Democrats, on the other hand, are calling on McConnell to postpone the vote until after Inauguration Day. Doing otherwise, they said, would be a raw power grab that would heighten acrimony in the already bitterly divided chamber and escalate pitched partisan warfare.

“And by all rights, by every modicum of decency and honor, Leader McConnell and the Republican Senate majority have no right to fill it. No right,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Monday.

Republicans, however, charge Democrats with hypocrisy, given that many in 2016 said open seats on the high court should be filled in election years but are now arguing they should not.

Vulnerable senators 

Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), who is in a tough re-election race, has not clarified his position, but said in 2016 that the next president should be able to pick a nominee for the Supreme Court. His office did not respond to requests for comment.

Iowa’s Ernst is in a tough reelection battle, and in July said she would back a Supreme Court appointment before a new president is seated even if Trump lost his bid for reelection, according to The Des Moines Register. A freshman who sits on the Judiciary Committee, Ernst took the opposite view in 2016.

North Carolina’s Tillis also backs a vote this year. He announced his position by echoing McConnell’s defense of his reversal. In 2016, control of the Senate and the White House was divided; this year, it’s not, McConnell said in a statement Friday.

“Four years ago, a Supreme Court vacancy arose under divided government and a lame-duck president as Americans were choosing his successor,” Tillis said in a statement Saturday. “Today, however, President Trump is again facing voters at the ballot box and North Carolinians will ultimately render their judgment on his presidency and how he chooses to fill the vacancy.”

Georgia’s Loeffler during a Fox News interview Saturday argued that the Constitution allows Trump to pick a nominee for a Senate vote. “We need to keep that process moving regardless of it being an election year,” she said.

Perdue said Sunday that he would support the president’s nomination, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Another vulnerable senator in a tough re-election race, Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), called the decision to nominate a new justice “wrong” and “disturbing.”

“It is unconscionable that Sen. McConnell and the majority leadership position will allow him to go forward and push through a nomination to the United States Supreme Court,” Jones said during a virtual campaign event on Facebook.

In Maine, Collins — also among her party’s most vulnerable members — said in a statement that she wouldn’t object if the Senate Judiciary Committee began the confirmation process but said the chamber shouldn’t vote before Election Day.

“We must act fairly and consistently, no matter which political party is in power,” she said, adding that the decision should be made by the president who is elected this fall.

Tennessee’s Blackburn and Alexander said they would vote for Trump’s nominee.

“I look forward for voting for someone who will be a constructionist constitutionalist and having the opportunity to fill that spot,” Blackburn said during a Fox News interview.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Allison Stevens
Allison Stevens

Allison Stevens is a reporter for States Newsroom's Washington bureau and can be reached at [email protected]

Ariana Figueroa
Ariana Figueroa

Ariana covers the nation's capital for States Newsroom. Her areas of coverage include politics and policy, lobbying, elections and campaign finance.