More than 800 people registered their opposition to SB 1395, which expands and changes regulations for the Empowerment Scholarship Account program. At the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Feb. 13, opponents of the bill wore red, while supporters wore yellow. Photo by Save Our Schools Arizona | Facebook
Lawmakers and parents argued Wednesday night at a Senate Finance Committee hearing whether a bill before them expanded or regulated a controversial school voucher program.
Senate Bill 1395, sponsored by Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, seemingly expands the Empowerment Scholarship Account program in many areas, including allowing students who don’t use the funds to keep them until they are 22 as long as they don’t graduate or get a GED.
The hearing was packed with people wearing yellow to symbolize their support of the bill, while those in opposition wore red. There were so many speakers registered that the committee’s chairman, Sen. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, limited everyone to 2 minutes.
Allen’s measure would allow many more students to qualify for the ESA program. Currently, enrollment in the program is limited. For instance, students that attend a district school that receives a D or F grade from the state are eligible. But SB 1395 would make it so the student merely has to live in the attendance boundary of such a school. Additionally, kindergarten age kids who reside in an area with a D or F rated school can qualify even if they are not attending that school.
The bill would also privatize the program and remove oversight from the Department of Education, having it be managed by a third party firm that is chosen by the state treasurer.
In November, Arizona voters elected a Democrat to lead the Department of Education for the first time in more than two decades.
Proponents and Republican lawmakers argued that the bill was much needed reform to the ESA program and not an expansion.
Some of the provisions in the bill add clarity on what can and cannot be purchased with ESA money, Allen told the committee. Many parents who spoke before the committee shared stories of being told that items such as math flash cards are not covered.
Many also shared their frustrations with how the program works, and how one year their child with a disability like autism may not qualify for an ESA but the next year they would.
The other side argued that the wording was vague enough that it could allow for things that are not needed for education, such as laptops, to be purchased with ESA funds. They also argued that expanding the program would divest more money from public schools, which could handle the needs of children who use ESAs if they had the proper funding.
The first person to speak before the committee was Superintendent of Public Instruction Kathy Hoffman, who said the Department of Education is opposition to the bill and is creating an ESA task force that consists of many of the people involved in Allen’s bill, as well as those who oppose it.
The aim of the task force is to examine issues within the ESA program to streamline it and make it easier for parents, Hoffman said.
She added that Allen’s bill adds “unnecessary layers of bureaucracy” to an already burdened program.
“I believe it is a good-governance bill,” Allen said in defense of the measure, adding that it would create “transparency” and “accountability”. Allen also said she is willing to amend language that may seem too vague in order to appease Democratic legislators who oppose any expansion of the ESA program.
After nearly three hours of testimony, the committee approved the bill along party lines, with Republicans supporting it.
Democratic legislators said they wished the constituents in the audience and other lawmakers would give Hoffman time to examine the program with the new task-force instead of using the law to implement fixes for what they said is a policy issue.
Additionally, many of the Democratic lawmakers said they were opposed to the measure as it contained very similar language to Proposition 305, which would have dramatically expanded ESAs and was rejected by a 2-to-1 margin in November. The bill is similarly opposed with more than 800 people stating online that they oppose it.
“I am representing the will of my constituents,” Sen. Sean Bowie, D-Phoenix, said in explaining his vote against SB 1395.
Mesnard said he hopes Allen implements the changes in the language to make it seem like less of an expansion to the ESA program so his Democratic colleagues would vote yes, though Mesnard added that he did not believe the bill was an expansion.
Before voting yes, Mesnard also added that voters’ rejection of Prop. 305 should not “paralyze us as legislators.”
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.